A federal government ban on the marketing of guns to medical marijuana card owners does not attack the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court mentioned on Wednesday. The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concerns nine Western states that come under the court’s supervision, including Washington, California, and Oregon.
S.Rowan Wilson, a Nevada woman, filed a lawsuit when she stated that after receiving a medical marijuana card she attempted to purchase a gun for self-defense in 2011. By mentioning the federal rule forbidding the marketing of firearms to illegal drug users, the gun store declined her request.
As the Court tells us, even if not using medical marijuana, just owning a card disqualifies an individual from ever having a gun, because people who use drugs including marijuana are inclined to weakened judgment and violence.
It appears that the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has informed gun retailers they can expect a person with a medical marijuana card utilizes the drug.
The Congress prudently decided that marijuana and another drug usage increases the risk of unreasonable or irregular behavior with which gun use should not be joined.
The government also assumed that it’s understandable for federal regulators to imply a medical marijuana card owner was more likely to utilize the drug.
Chaz Rainey, Wilson’s attorney, who planned to appeal believes that the Second Amendment must be implemented with more consistency. He also mentioned that we encounter the situation where having a medical marijuana card is sufficient to state you don’t get a gun, but if you are on the no-fly record your constitutional right is still defended.
The 9th Circuit also denied other legal challenges to the ban that were suggested by Wilson, containing her argument that her gun rights were removed without proper process.
The director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, Paul Armentano, said that assuming that marijuana users are more likely to violence is a misconception. Moreover, Paul also believes that the responsible grown-ups who use cannabis in a method that is law-abiding must obtain the same legal protections and advantages as other citizens.
Image source: Pixabay